Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 14(10): e30923, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2155762

ABSTRACT

Remdesivir is approved by the FDA for the treatment of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. It is known to be associated with transient bradycardia that resolves after discontinuation of the drug. We present a case of a 71-year-old male with a history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, and atrial flutter (rate controlled with carvedilol) presented for evaluation of worsening dyspnea, dry cough, and fatigue. His COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was positive and his chest x-ray showed right mid-lung opacity. Oxygen saturation was 88% on room air. He was started on dexamethasone and remdesivir. Bradycardia was noted on telemetry monitoring 48 hours after starting remdesivir. Carvedilol was discontinued, but the bradycardia persisted. Heart rate reached a nadir of 38 beats per minute (bpm) three days after completion of remdesivir therapy. Due to persistent bradycardia, he received a dual-chamber cardiac pacemaker without any immediate complications. Three months later, his pacemaker interrogation showed 99% ventricular pacing. We recommend that extra caution should be taken when initiating remdesivir therapy in individuals with baseline conduction abnormalities due to the possibility of persistent bradycardia.

2.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) ; 79(9):2371-2371, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1751449
3.
Cureus ; 13(10): e18573, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1502758

ABSTRACT

Introduction In Saudi Arabia and countries around the world, clinical health practice has been transformed by the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). During the early days of the pandemic, it was a major challenge to care for pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and their newborn infants. In this article, we share our experience in the management of newborn infants delivered to mothers with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Methods A prospective single-center observational study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, National Guard Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia. Data collection started in March 2020 and was completed in October 2020. The inclusion criteria included mothers with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and their newborn infants. Results A total of 45 pregnant women with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 were included in the study. Their mean age was 30.23±5.92 years. The mode of delivery was spontaneous vaginal delivery in 27 women (60%), cesarean section in 15 women (33.3%), and assisted vaginal delivery in three women (6.7%). Three mothers (6.7%) required intensive care unit admission. A total of 45 babies were born and 25 were females (55.6%), 20 males (44.4%). None of the babies had specific symptoms related to COVID-19. All babies were tested negative on the two COVID-19 nasopharyngeal swabs. Babies were initially admitted to the NICU and one baby required prolonged NICU stay due to extreme prematurity (23 weeks), one baby died due to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and respiratory distress syndrome, and the remaining babies were discharged home in a stable condition. Conclusion Our experience suggests that maternal outcomes are generally favorable and no difference between vaginal and cesarean delivery in the risk of virus transmission. With strict implementation of infection prevention measures, mother-to-infant transmission is very unlikely. Early bathing of the newborn infant is preferred to reduce the risk of transmission of infection to newborn infants and the hospital staff. Breastfeeding is safe if performed under strict infection prevention measures.

4.
Pan Afr Med J ; 39: 173, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1468745

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), first appearing in Wuhan, China, and later declared as a pandemic, has caused serious morbidity and mortality worldwide. Severe cases usually present with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, acute kidney injury (AKI), liver damage, or septic shock. However, with recent advances in severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) research, the virus´s effect on cardiac tissues has become evident. Reportedly, an increased number of COVID-19 patients manifested serious cardiac complications such as heart failure, increased troponin, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (NT-proBNP), cardiomyopathies, and myocarditis. These cardiac complications initially present as chest tightness, chest pain, and heart palpitations. Diagnostic investigations such as telemetry, electrocardiogram (ECG), cardiac biomarkers (troponin, NT-proBNP), and inflammatory markers (D-dimer, fibrinogen, PT, PTT), must be performed according to the patient´s condition. The best available options for treatment are the provision of supportive care, anti-viral therapy, hemodynamic monitoring, IL-6 blockers, statins, thrombolytic, and anti-hypertensive drugs. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) healthcare workers should be well-informed about the evolving research regarding COVID-19 and approach as a multi-disciplinary team to devise effective strategies for challenging situations to reduce cardiac complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Heart Diseases/virology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Biomarkers/metabolism , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Humans , Patient Care Team/organization & administration
5.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 22(1): 83-95, 2021 03 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1168425

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced hospitals to prioritize COVID-19 patients, restrict resources, and cancel all non-urgent elective cardiac procedures. Clinical visits have only been facilitated for emergency purposes. Fewer patients have been admitted to the hospital for both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMI) and a profound decrease in heart failure services has been reported. A similar reduction in the patient presentation is seen for ischemic heart disease, decompensated heart failure, and endocarditis. Cardiovascular services, including catheterization, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), cardiac investigations such as electrocardiograms (ECGs), exercise tolerance test (ETT), dobutamine stress test, computed tomography (CT) angiography, transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) have been reported to have declined and performed on a priority basis. The long-term implications of this decline have been discussed with major concerns of severe cardiac complications and vulnerabilities in cardiac patients. The pandemic has also had psychological impacts on patients causing them to avoid seeking medical help. This review discusses the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of various cardiology services and aims to provide strategies to restore cardiovascular services including structural changes in the hospital to make up for the reduced staff personnel, the use of personal protective equipment in healthcare workers, and provides alternatives for high-risk cardiac imaging, cardiac interventions, and procedures. Implementation of the triage system, risk assessment scores, and telemedicine services in patients and their adaptation to the cardiovascular department have been discussed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiology/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Infection Control/organization & administration , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures , Humans , Telemedicine , Triage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL